In recent years
the public has become increasingly interested in receiving information
on the health impacts of the different environmental risks. That interest,
added to the need to involve society in environmental risk management,
has motivated the development of risk communication.
The countries of Latin
America and the Caribbean are in a process of transition toward a
culture of citizen participation and of public institutions, which
have the obligation of informing the social sectors about their activities
with transparent financial reporting and participatory activities.
Risk communication
has been turned into a process that promotes the exchange of information
and opinions among individuals, groups, and institutions. Risk communication
has three facets: it is a tool, a phenomenon, and a proposal. Besides,
it is a process that has progressed from ignoring the public in the
past, to incorporating the public as a legitimate partner in present
times.
Risk communication
is applied in designing programs to tackle a crisis situation, in
health care, and in obtaining consensus on a particular topic.
In risk communication, one fundamental factor is the credibility of
those providing the information; other key factors are good knowledge
of the target public, and an effective message. The message can be
easily understood if it is transmitted in a simple way and in terms
accessible to any citizen so that the public can understand what a
risk is and how they can participate in their personal protection.
From the government
viewpoint, risk communication respects the public (being participatory)
and their right to know (being transparent) and also recognizes the
limitations of the government response.
Work in conjunction
with the media is another important role of risk communication, since
it is the mechanism through which the message reaches the target public.
In addition, the media are one of the main sources of information
on the public’s perception of the risks.
Planning plays a very
important role in risk communication. Its success or failure can depend
on the definition of clear goals, which will vary depending on the
nature of the risk and may include information, education, persuasion,
negotiation, assurance, and prevention.
In all work that implies
the environmental exposure of a population to some hazard (physical,
chemical or biological), risk communication is the tool that should
be used to provide information to the affected groups, since it identifies
the concerns of the community and responds to them; it reduces the
tension between the community and the personnel of the agency or institution;
and it explains the health risk to the community effectively. It offers
the opportunity to communicate health risks in a planned way while
at the same time being sensitive to the needs of the population; it
integrates the community into the risk management process; it helps
to establish trust; and it relieves fear and indignation.
It must be emphasized
that risk communication is not a recipe for making good messages to
communicate a risk. It is a participatory methodology for planning
and drawing up a communication program adequate to the needs of the
parties involved. If the planning work is not well done, even if good
messages are prepared, they will be of no use unless the community
gets to hear them.
|